2018-12-20 19:31:32
If you or you loved one have a heart and a brain, including your dog, cat, gerbil, mouse, gecko, or parrot, there are a number of reasons why you might not want to give a wireless or surveillance-capable gift this year.
Making a Mouse Through Better Chemistry?
My high school chemistry teacher, Mr. Plati, was part scientist and part entertainer. The first day of our sophomore year, he had a list of the chemical components of a mouse on the blackboard. Holding a glass beaker and a pipette, he began pouring each of the chemicals into the test tube, making a mouse. He then asked us why we did not end up cooking up a mouse. And he launched into a question of how chemistry arranges itself into living matter, in a lesson that has been completely ignored by decades of wireless economic frenzy that has currently reached a fatal attraction to 5G, which holds great appeal for the pornography, video game, surveillance, and investment industries.
Here are five examples of reasons why you may not want to join the lemmings regarding wireless.
1 – Wireless Home Security Systems cat cam, or baby monitor
One the more colorful stories of the year unfolded when a couple realized that when Jamie Smith breastfed her baby, someone was watching … their baby monitor was being hacked.
Let’s be clear that there are no protections in place for customer privacy. If you are watching your home from your cellphone when you are across the country, you do not know who is watching you or your household members, and watching you as you watch.
We don’t know who has access to the video feeds; and at this point, we do not know how much bribery and blackmail is being enabled by this technology. It is not a question of whether or not you have anything to hide. Regardless of how one felt about the decision, the reality is that if the Brett Kavanaugh hearings were to take place today, it is not true that data driven by technology instead of a handwritten calendar would have provided evidence of time/date stamp location.
The decision would have rested in the hands of whoever owned the data. Data is already being manipulated to support specific outcomes,[1] with absolutely no course correction or recourse in sight.
Giving a baby monitor to new parents may be the moral and ethical equivalent of gifting cigarettes.
2 – A wireless health monitor
The promotion of a wireless device to monitor heart health[2] may be absurd as promoting cigarettes to address a scratchy throat, because wireless microwave frequencies affect the heart (which is electromagnetic), as well as other organs, which are also electromagnetic. [3]
3 – A cellphone for a young child
If you are not giving a fifth of bourbon or a box of cigars to your child, don’t give them a cellphone.
Cellphones are an inadequately regulated industry, and the addictive qualities of wireless technologies especially for children [4],[5] remain unacknowledged.
See more
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/12/five-things-not-to-gift-to-a-loved-one-this-holiday-season-if-you-have-a-heart-or-a-brain-or-a-soul.html
olalathos
Making a Mouse Through Better Chemistry?
My high school chemistry teacher, Mr. Plati, was part scientist and part entertainer. The first day of our sophomore year, he had a list of the chemical components of a mouse on the blackboard. Holding a glass beaker and a pipette, he began pouring each of the chemicals into the test tube, making a mouse. He then asked us why we did not end up cooking up a mouse. And he launched into a question of how chemistry arranges itself into living matter, in a lesson that has been completely ignored by decades of wireless economic frenzy that has currently reached a fatal attraction to 5G, which holds great appeal for the pornography, video game, surveillance, and investment industries.
Here are five examples of reasons why you may not want to join the lemmings regarding wireless.
1 – Wireless Home Security Systems cat cam, or baby monitor
One the more colorful stories of the year unfolded when a couple realized that when Jamie Smith breastfed her baby, someone was watching … their baby monitor was being hacked.
Let’s be clear that there are no protections in place for customer privacy. If you are watching your home from your cellphone when you are across the country, you do not know who is watching you or your household members, and watching you as you watch.
We don’t know who has access to the video feeds; and at this point, we do not know how much bribery and blackmail is being enabled by this technology. It is not a question of whether or not you have anything to hide. Regardless of how one felt about the decision, the reality is that if the Brett Kavanaugh hearings were to take place today, it is not true that data driven by technology instead of a handwritten calendar would have provided evidence of time/date stamp location.
The decision would have rested in the hands of whoever owned the data. Data is already being manipulated to support specific outcomes,[1] with absolutely no course correction or recourse in sight.
Giving a baby monitor to new parents may be the moral and ethical equivalent of gifting cigarettes.
2 – A wireless health monitor
The promotion of a wireless device to monitor heart health[2] may be absurd as promoting cigarettes to address a scratchy throat, because wireless microwave frequencies affect the heart (which is electromagnetic), as well as other organs, which are also electromagnetic. [3]
3 – A cellphone for a young child
If you are not giving a fifth of bourbon or a box of cigars to your child, don’t give them a cellphone.
Cellphones are an inadequately regulated industry, and the addictive qualities of wireless technologies especially for children [4],[5] remain unacknowledged.
See more
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/12/five-things-not-to-gift-to-a-loved-one-this-holiday-season-if-you-have-a-heart-or-a-brain-or-a-soul.html
olalathos
ΜΟΙΡΑΣΤΕΙΤΕ
ΔΕΙΤΕ ΑΚΟΜΑ
ΕΠΟΜΕΝΟ ΑΡΘΡΟ
Στο ΕΦ 1 ο ΑΝΥΕΘΑ Παν. Ρήγας
ΣΧΟΛΙΑΣΤΕ
